MANZOOR ALI versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 526 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302 was the husband of the complainant / petitioner's estranged wife who was allegedly murdered by the accused who is the brother of the complainant / applicant. Was that when the complainant's evidence / applicant and a conscience were filed during the trial, the trial court felt that the complainant / applicant had withdrawn the facts as per the FIR and had stated different facts. Have done. Being close to each other, they followed suit and deliberately giving false evidence to save their relatives. In the light of such a statement of trial, the complainant / applicant was arrested saying that he had no hope of justice and would not conduct a fair or impartial trial by him. The trial court and another court had applied for the transfer of the case to the trial judge, disagreeing with his comments or refusing to express his views, but he almost did not. It was found that the complainant / applicant had in the circumstances changed his version of the FIR trial judge and gave false evidence; under Section 193, PPC, the offense of the complainant / applicant without his case was earlier. Who had created enough and in the minds of the complainant / applicants there is a real fear that he will be a judge in the trial judge's case Anh will not hear the case impartially, can be transferred to another court in the trial judge's file transfer and related conditions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Moro lawyer