Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR AHMED versus STATE

West Pakistan Weapons Ordinance 1965 Section 13E Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), the alleged rehabilitation of a section 103 pistol was carried out during a broad day in a colony located in the house, which was a heavily populated area, but police did not Neither allegedly chosen to witness the recovery of a private person nor was the prisoner or resident in the house, where the pistol was alleged to have been recovered, was linked to the search and recovery of two policemen and purchased a private person. No reason was given for not doing so. , When recovered in a residential area where the honorable men of the area should have been present who should have been associated with such recovery, the recovery of the weapons / pistols, in the circumstances, the mandatory provisions of section 103, Cr. Was violated. The alleged suspect was not sealed on the spot when recovered, nor was he sent to a ballistic expert for examination and ammunition, so the recovery even in evidence of the evidence counsel's recovery. It was not displayed and the FIR did not show whether the pistol recovered from the suspect was automatic or a semi-automatic prosecution evidence that the suspect suspected of being punished cannot be sustained. registration advocate from Kamra lawyer