Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 testimony was introduced to show the evidence that the complaint was made to attack the accused, but the prosecution had found effective and reliable evidence to trigger the incident. Failed to help and was bound to fail. In order to react to the prosecution's testimony to give a witness the opportunity to testify, his testimony could not have been the basis for the defendant's conviction, as other evidence on record of his presence on the occasion also supported it. Was not done On the occasion the complainant's conduct was also unnatural. Medical evidence does not support the prosecution's case, the prosecution failed to lead to convincing, concrete and independent evidence to prove his case against the accused, the incident turned out to be a hit and run affair that had a criminal history and There was nothing I could do to survive that the complainant didn't complain about. You know, and one or more of those people were shot while they were on their way home, the suspect was brought to the picture by the complainant only by an estimate and the trial court convicted and punished the accused. Was set aside and acquitted, giving the suspect the benefit of the doubt. list of advocates from Village Sunder lawyer