Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ASGHAR KHAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Law Evidence Order 1984 Article 49 A civil servant seeking a civil servant's correction of his birth date was issued a decree and the date of birth in his matric certificate was changed according to the Establishment Division's decree, however, I was denied the change. The establishment division's constitutional application against the decision of the Establishment Division was denied on the basis of its date of birth. The employee has been discharged from public service. He has been retired for more than 35 years at any time during his service Didn't object. At the last stage of his service, he provoked that government employees did not impose the Federation of Pakistan on the issue of his date of birth, which was an essential list of party rankings that were periodically circulated during the service on which the government Employees were never objected to. If his date of birth, which was now being claimed, was shown on the application form before then, he would have been eligible for the appointment. There were justifications granted by the High Court to change the order under which the constitutional application of the public servant against the decision of the Establishment Division was dropped. The order passed by the Federal Government on the date of change of his birth date and notification for his retirement, thus, did not face any legal or factual error and took no exception. Can go list of supreme court advocates from Bannu lawyer