REGIONAL MANAGER, UTILITY STORES, CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN, FAISALABAD versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22A (8) (g) National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (c) unfair labor practice by employer employees who were salesmen in the employer corporation A charge sheet was made for this. After being convicted of the commodity black marketing and black marketing offense in questioning, his services were terminated, accusing him of unfair labor practices, Section 22A (8) (G) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969. ) And terminated his employment. Through the employer, he was unable to file an unfair trial case against the employer because he failed to file a record on the record to support the claim that his trade union activities had led him to the employer. Had hunted. Employee Services Terminated Employee Black Marketing Accusation The allegation was completely proved against the employee by an independent and impartial inquiry, filed by the Employees Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. Under Section 2A (8) (G) and Regulation 32 (2) (C) of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations 1973, was not enforceable.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Rahwali lawyer