AFTAB AHMED versus MUHAMMAD AFTAB AHMED
Applicants for leave to appeal Articles 42 and 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, were not applied as a party to the writ petition filed by the respondents in the High Court. Was made, nor was his view brought to the record of the High Court. The petitioners had applied for a direct appeal on the request that they were badly affected by the High Court decision which has affected them badly. The aggrieved person should have the strict Shariah right to file the writ petition and if he can show any interest in the matter which has been badly affected by an executive or a court order, he should file a leave application. Will be fully eligible. Appeal directly to the Supreme Court was feasible as the petitioners were the grieving persons in the sense of the SKT on44, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Rahwali lawyer
