Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAFIZ SHAKIR versus UNITED BANK LTD.

Section 44 and 47 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Sections 2 (a), 3 and 4 United Bank Limited (Staff Service) Rules, 1981, R15 (1) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Handwriting Act 1974 And Kashmir Council Legislative List, Item No. 14 Return Valedictory Suitable Forum Pakistan and Azad Kashmir were equally organized and regulated by the employees of the Bank. The same was the case with Azad Kashmir in regard to the rehabilitation / dismissal of employees who were available to their counterparts. Employees were required to file an appeal before the service tribunal under Section 4, Service Tribunals Act, 1973 under appropriate treatment to deal with their recovery, the High Court under sections 44 and 47 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974 The constitutional jurisdiction of was deleted. As it was excluded under Article 212 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), it is claimed that when employees were working in Azad Kashmir and the Order / R was affected by the Attachment Scheme in Azad Kashmir, The order shall be deemed to affect the affairs of Azad Kashmir, the Panchayat Scheme relating to the terms and conditions of the employees, nor to the matters of Azad Kashmir, irrespective of the provisions of section 2 (a) Service Tribunals. The Act, 1973, whether implemented or adopted by Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council, was before the Tribunal, an open treatment service for employees. family advocate from Wahi hassain lawyer