Find a Lawyer

SAJID NAVEED versus STATE

Corruption Prevention Act, 1947 Section 5 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Value of Evidence of Section 161 Evidence available on record to show that the simple recovery of the accused's money was not sufficient to guarantee the crime. Was not that the accused was received illegally, the party did not see the transfer of money to the accused because the complainant had not been declared unlawful and neither The conversation between them was heard; the complainant's evidence, which was confessed, was strained because of lack of free association with the accused. Were taken. Do not rely on Omission to produce independent witnesses at the time of the raid made the prosecutor's story suspicious. Defense evidence has proven that the complainant was forcibly placed in the accused's pocket and was acquitted of the charges. - The benefit of the doubt in the circumstances law firms from Kala Bagh lawyer