Find a Lawyer

PAK SUZUKI MOTOR CO. LTD., KARACHI versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN

Industrial Relations Ordinance Section 2 (viii) of 1969 and 25 A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) \ Ordinance (VII 1968), removal of sections 12 and 15 applicants / employees who challenged their suspension. He alleges that his services were terminated verbatim despite direct appointment by the company after an interview and medical examination, no appointment order, interview letter, medical certificate and other documents were submitted by the employees. To indicate that they were directly appointed by the company or that a company has a governing body The control their employees are working in the sector who had failed to tell the company how they were engaged in trade. No salary slip or any other documents were presented by the alleged employees to show that they were employees. None of the alleged employees of the company was a member of the Collective Bargaining Agent or any other union in Ampel, Owais resolved its complaints notice and filed its complaints against the company and the contractor employees, Has failed miserably to prove that he is an employee of the company and not the contractor, his services terminated at the time of termination of the contract between the company and the contractor. In relation to the applicants / alleged employees, the Company, West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 is not responsible for compliance with provisions of the Labor Court filed by the applicants / alleged employees against verbal suspension. The complaint is not allowed to allow the complaint us immigration advocates from Rawalpindi lawyer