Find a Lawyer

MADINA TRADERS versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Implementation of soybean feed for the Central Board of Revenue, Customs Act, 1969 Poultry under the notification, section 25 13, issued by the Customs Act 1969 Section 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) 14 2 1998 On the assumption of customs duty, the High Court maintained that constitutional petitions were not enforceable, however, on the basis that the applicant had adopted an alternative method under the verification of the Act, it was issued on 14 2 1998, while the petition. The investor opened a letter of credit for importing the said item in March. At the beginning of the Letter of Credit, 1998, the applicant knew at what cost he would have to pay customs duty and other taxes on the importation of such item because if a sensible person has to suffer some kind of loss. Shouldn't have been imported. As to whether the valuation reported by the Central Board of Revenue in its notification dated 14 2 1998, is related to international prices at the relevant date in the country, where it was said. What was imported was a question of fact, which cannot be exercised in the constitutional jurisdiction of the Constitution. The impugned order did not face any weakness. Appeal to appeal was denied. best advocate from Daska lawyer