BALQEES BEGUM versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, MUZAFFARGARH
Section 10 and 11 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) of the Homeless Persons (Land Settlement) Act, 1958, Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for re-transfer of the allotment after the judiciary has been applied to the settlement process. Verification Verification Target proceedings before the notification officer Validity Settlement Authority, while ruling on the application under Sections 10 and 11, the correct order of settlement authority for the allotment of applicants under the Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act 1958 Was announced, and investigations followed. The Commissioner also found no fault in the lower property allotment, and also, that, the proceedings initiated by the respondents regarding the allotment of the same property in favor of the petitioners were retained. Was. Under the CPC Judgment Order, prohibited under Section 11 Judgment of the Race Judasta rule, the proceedings ended in favor of the applicants whose allotment was genuine. Such order was no longer challenged, The final victory was achieved and the settlement authority could not be challenged after several years of delay, especially when the allotment had reached the final settlement authority. The matter could not be examined at the time the target was not pending the date, ie, the process of granting open allotment of applicants after the target date of 1974, therefore, without any jurisdiction. Without the hearing notification officer, the options were completely ruled out.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
