RAB NAWAZ versus STATE
The testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 witnesses could not be relied upon by the witnesses, who were natural witnesses to the incident and any enmity against the accused for falsely implicating them in this case. Was not, especially when the accused was also involved. In the presence of one witness in the same area, the effect of the recovery of the weapon of the crime, no matter from calling another witness from that area, the dagger recovered on the accused's report was found to be stained with human blood. The immediate registration of the FIR not only eliminated the possibility of fraud and the possibility of fraud by the complaining party, but also the stated prosecution of the prosecution witnesses, along with the evidence of the recovery of the ocular account events. Also confirmed the truth of the story. Defensive version was found to be neither valid in the given circumstances nor possibly in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer