Find a Lawyer

WASIM ALI TABISH versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Clauses 9 and 11 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 (1973), Article 199 constitutionally, the applicant being a Tehsildar and Deputy Tehsil, was acting as Registrar and Sub-Registrar requesting verification of their original positions. The undergraduates were educators and deputy educators. Administrative control of the Board of Revenue, therefore, they could not, for whatever reason or logic, question the right to pass an order to the Board of Revenue, under which they were returned to their original positions, Because applicants may have worked for many years. Registrar / Sub-Registrar, but they cannot be assumed that they have obtained their right to continue indefinitely in these positions and for the time being, the Government shall be deemed to be appropriate with Government employees and against them. The right to an appointment was paid. Any position which the Government deems appropriate for them cannot be controlled by such right of the Government. The HC is like interfering in the internal affairs of the government departments which the government itself will run: the High Court Can't regulate or oversee the day-to-day functioning because primarily the Revenue Officers were under the administrative control of the Board. Revenue, which has full authority to issue an order in relation to its posting and transfer of information from one place to another across the province, and applicants cannot question such right of the Constitutional application of the Board of Revenue which The applicants had questioned the Board of Revenue's right to exchange it. Employees were considered completely misunderstood and without merit, and therefore, maintained online advocate from Taxila lawyer