Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT versus SALEEM ADAYA

Forfeiture of import duty vehicle from Customs Duty, Section 13 and 156 Notification No. SRO 783 (1) / 92, dated 19 8 1992, Customs Duty under Customs Duty under Notification No. SRO 783 (1) / 92. Has claimed to be exempt. Imported vehicle was issued against the State Bank's small facility in 1992 and its explanation. The notification issued the notice to the importer that he was unable to take advantage of the notification and that he had damaged the state revenue and the letter of the confiscated State Bank which was required to file a bill of entry for vehicle approval. Subsequently, the notification was inconsistent and the importer fulfilled the conditions contained in the State Bank's notification letter which did not exceed the executive directive. , There can be no disappointment in the operation, otherwise the exemption facility in customs duty etc. has already been extended to four other importers under the said notification, the importer was also entitled to this facility. best advocate from Chak 4 b c lawyer