Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus STATE

A video recording of the confessional statement was made before the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Section 26 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, while the statement was made before the Deputy Superintendent of Police, while such statement was not made voluntarily at the police station and has been added. Status was not obtained. Judicial confession, because the accused was not mentally free where the accused was willing to make a confessional statement instead of recording his video, the accused should have been produced before a magistrate to dispel any suspicion. Confession has been made a crime. Before a deputy superintendent of police officer can be accepted under section 26, Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, he can still be rejected by the court. advocate from Mian Walli lawyer