NATIONAL HIGH WAY AUTHORITY versus TARIQ KHURSHID
Complaint petition for retention of Articles 1 (3) (a) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 and 25A National Highway Authority Act (IV of 1991), Sections 13 and 17 of Pakistan (1973), Art 199 Constitution Petition The Labor Court dismissed the Highway Authority on the ground that the provisions of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, were not applied to seniority under the National Highway Authority, but the Labor Appellate Tribunal rejected Rejecting the order, stating that since the employee was a work charge employee, he was not. A public servant and industrial relations were operating under the ordinance, the provisions of section 13 (3) of the 1969 National Highway Authority Act, 1991 show that services under the National Highway Authority have been declared a service of Pakistan and Every person holding this office. The Authority was deemed to be a Government Employee for the purpose of the Service Tribunals Act 1973 under Section 17 of the National Highway Authority Act, 1991 also provided on the clear and clear terms that the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 would not apply or National In relation to the Highway Authority, any complaint could not be brought under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, which had to be operated under the National Highway Authority High. The court accepted the constitutional appeal against the Labor Appellate Tribunal's decision, declared the law issued by it to be of legal authority and without legal effect, and reinstated the labor court-approved restitution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from FR DI Khan lawyer