UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB versus AAMAR MAHMUD IJAZ
The University of Punjab Act 1973 appeared in the Section 32 Calendar of the University of Punjab, Regulation 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1850 Respondent M Section (Thoracic Surgery) failed to obtain the qualifying number in the General Surgery paper. The claim that some of her respondent's pages were missing and she was awarded the average number was not accepted and the respondent's constitutional request was successful and the applicant (university) was instructed to give her the average number. Reglin 6 will take care of the calendar of Olt Proviso, PU. In a situation where the response book received by the examiner was lost before or after the evaluation so that the candidate could be declared entitled to the award of the average number received in other papers Resp Six pages of Respondent's Response Book Was fully covered, the respondent was missing, the other two papers received more than 60% marks, General Surgery was entitled to the number 61 in the High Court paper, while directing Pettit to the average number of respondents. To give, thus, Regln 6 did not make any mistake in the interpretation, the appeal of the PU calendar The leave was denied in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Jhal Magsi lawyer