COLLECTOR OF CUSTOM versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM
Customs Act 1969 Section 162 Legal Action Sub divisional magistrate appointed magistrate at the request of Assistant Director Intelligence (Customs and Excise) to conduct a raid on the warehouse where the alleged smuggled tea was preserved and the customs authorities Raided under Section 162 of the Judicial Magistrate. At the request of the Customs Act, 1969, the search warrant could be issued by the sub divisional magistrate, who passed the order, the executive magistrate and not the judicial magistrate, many requests for the issuance of the search warrant were false and misunderstood. There was an executive after the order was approved. The order under which he appointed a magistrate to supervise the raid as a duty magistrate, in the presence of the deputy magistrate, was made in compliance with the order of the sub divisional magistrate, under the provisions of section 162 of the Customs Act 1969 Cannot search accordingly. Legal provisions were complied with. Search illegal and to no effect
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Balakot lawyer