Find a Lawyer

JAWAID IQBAL versus MUHAMMAD ARIF

Sections 4 (2), 5 (2) and 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979, the tenant's removal order was upheld by the tenant controller, the High Court The only question was emphasized by the fact that the rent controller, who had decided to request the expulsion, cannot be determined under section 4 (2), Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979, Because he had neither served as a civil judge nor for three years as a first class magistrate, the High Court dismissed such a request, leaving it on this single question. It was demanded that the senior civil judge, who served as a rent controller in connection with the eviction order, was not promoted to civil judge or judicial magistrate, but was appointed directly, not It will only be considered that there is a strict requirement for the post of Senior Civil Judge, for which he was directly appointed, but, also, carefully and cautiously, in the case of Section 4 (2) of the Civil Judge. There was a minimum requirement of the status quo, the Sindh Hire Ordinance, 1979 1979 to allow the emigration of the emcees, in spite of such acts, to seek legal authority in the suicide attack. Uch should not be questioned, though directly challenged in the presence of all the parties, if otherwise meet the requirements, the rent will remain unpredictable challenge of qualification eligibility. The rulers were not able to apply for leave to appeal against the order of eviction even though otherwise, the eviction order by the Rent Controller would have been excruciating and in the public interest. property advocates from Havelian lawyer