Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BOOTA versus ALLAH DITTA

Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 115 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Defendants of Mohammedan Lati Heritage claim to have participated in the legacy of the deceased landlord in favor of the defendants. No change in the legacy of the deceased was guaranteed and their (plaintiffs 'rights) proved effective. The trial court rejected the plaintiffs' claim but the appellate court ruled that the same decision, Likewise, the petitioner's claim of correctness of the High Court also claimed that the case was subjected to a statute of limitations and that he had Claimants was stopped. The High Court considered the procedure for claiming property in the property, and for reasons that the accused did not emphasize that under section 115, the High Court had issued the ruling under Sections (A), (B) of CPC. And (c) had not considered. In section 115, the CPC which revolves around the question of jurisdiction alone, no interference case was made in the unanimous decision; leave to appeal was denied in the circumstances. famous supreme court advocate from Pishin lawyer