Find a Lawyer

NAZIR AHMAD KHAN versus SHERAZ ATTAULLAH KHAN

Two sons vendors jointly filed a case for filing a case of section 15 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, which the trial court's plaintiff did not satisfy with the court-ordered sale amount, after which the appellate court Reduced the sales amount and ordered the deposit. After the due date appellate court's decision and decree, a plaintiff withdrew from the case, after which the participating plaintiff filed a petition for amendment of the decree and amending the terms of OXLVII, R1. Filed, CPC Appeal Court instructed the co-plaintiff not to allow the plaintiff to deposit half of the sale amount and did not allow him to deposit the full amount, so the review request was eventually dismissed. Was also completely excluded that the sale amount as per the court order was fixed on the date fixed by the court. Was not submitted. The review designated the appellate court's ruling and after the plaintiff submitted his share of the sale with the plaintiff, the decision was set by the court on a minor date, if it did not comply with any definite covenant. If not, the responsibility of not collecting the balance cannot be placed on the participating plaintiff because it has not been ordered to court. Each officer shall have the right to freedom before the sale and the return of any of the defendants will be the cause. His name will be removed and the rest of the pre-emptor, if he is entitled to it on the basis of his own right, may obtain a decree for the company selling the entire land to the co-plaintiff, his former Right to authorize list of advocates from Thatta lawyer