HABIBULLAH versus RENT CONTROLLER, PESHAWAR
The unconditional obligation to pay rent on the second part of the tenant payment under clause (vi) of section 13 (2) (vi), second time constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 of Article 135 (2). Admission was limited only to the North-West Frontier Province, pursuant to the second clause of the Border Section 13 (2), the same can be done if the unconditional admission of the obligation to rent is entered The tenants were allegedly due to default, if the admission was previously made. At the date of the hearing and if the rent controller was satisfied that the tenant had not made such a default on the previous occasion, the High Court correctly found that the tenant's admission in the written statement of responsibility. Was, for all practical purposes, before the first date of the hearing, which is generally but subject to the context, will have the meaning and meaning of when the structure of the case or the recording of the evidence. For such a case, admission to such a liability was unconditional not only a clear offer of payment but also an increased rate of control. Was the High Court may also be rightly knew he had established that there was no pre-determined prior to a claim in case of evacuation or otherwise extended way. To benefit the tenants in case of default under section (vi) of section 13 (2) of the tenants, the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, was not open for exception.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Rangoo lawyer