Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 17 Basic Rules, FR 17 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Government employees who perform duties and duties against a higher rank for a specific position. There are high posts entitled to such salaries by the government employees representing the department, for the high salaries which were rejected by the government employees, instead of filing an appeal before the service tribunal, another representation was made before the prime minister. Unanswered, the service tribunal was dismissed after filing an appeal for service employees. Due to some restriction, the civil servant filed an appeal before the service tribunal about ten years after the cause of action was taken, indicating that the public servant's representation was for the first time approximately After a gap of four years. Visit the authorized jurisdiction forum to resolve the delimitation period. And the mere reminder cannot be extended = the government employee admittedly did not file a petition to the service tribunal for delay, nor placed any material on record which delayed the prescribed treatment. Can justify being fit. The findings regarding the limitation in filing an appeal by the service tribunal regarding the relevant aspects and the conduct of public servants were sufficiently valid and unacceptable to assist the law-abiding and illicit service tribunal. , While properly denying the delay, mentioning the appropriate cause and justifying it, advocate for immigration from Village Sunder lawyer