Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHER MUHAMMAD versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB


Colonization Act of Government Lands (Punjab) 1912 Section 10 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Islamabad Oocytes Scheme, Scheduled Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) Section 11 Impact of suppressing facts of applicant in his civil case Applicants of the judiciary who contend that the claim of property rights in the land was not valid by the Board of Revenue, likewise the petitioner of the High Court had in fact suppressed the High Court order in the aftermath of the litigation. The applicant will not be able to protest the same case again in the civil court because of litigation regarding the grant of property rights to the applicant. The suit had a positive impact on the judicial principle of justice, and after the family's qualifications and claims, the civil court could not reopen the dispute. It was finally decided to appeal to the applicant at the highest level.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Khanbel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.