Find a Lawyer

DEPUTY COMMANDANT, F.R.P., N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE, EX-CONSTABLE NO.2867

Border Police Rules 1975 Constitution of RR 5, 6 & 8 Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Removal of corruption allegations of misconduct in compliance with the orders of superiors The service tribunal reduced the punishment for removal from employment The reason for the increase in the two-year withholding penalty was the increase in integration without the accumulated effect by the authority that public servants were members of the disciplinary force and according to the procedure provided under the police rules, Was properly acted and admitted to disobedience, the service tribunal was not legally valid, In the absence of a legal weakness, to go to the root of the matter and in the absence of prejudice to the civil servants, interfere with the order of the question; this action was carried out under R 8, North West Frontier Province Police Rules 1975, Service Tribunal. Had mistakenly considered such action to be under RR 5 and 6, Northwestern Frontier Province Police Rules 1975, although it was stated that the rules did not apply to the proceedings. In question; and that if any irregularities affecting the defense of public servants were committed, the proper procedure for obtaining a remand for a fresh inquiry was according to the Police Rules for Service Tribunals, 1975, Appeal leave granted to consider competing authority online advocate from Poonch lawyer