MUHAMMAD AJAIB versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL
The Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 section 13 (3) was prepared in writing after 2/3 days of knowledge of the sale by the claimants, even though the Talib first made the knowledge on the sale of money. In the trial, the court dismissed the defendant's case. In the appeal, the appellate court held that the appellate court had found the accused within the reasonable time for non-commitment and the High Court decided in reviewing the judgment and decree of section 13 (3) of the appellate court's jurisdiction. Sanadia was, in the Punjab Pre-Impression Act, 1991, the stand that this action had to take place within a reasonable time. The period of 2/3 days after the filing of Talib was proper time in which the plaintiff performed the performance of the litigation by the plaintiff, substantially complying with Section 13 (3), Punjab Pre-empt. Act, 1991 and will satisfy the expression as soon as possible High Efendant's appeal was dismissed in the d cases, as soon as the decision and order of the High Court were incomplete.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Mehmood Kot lawyer