Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALIL versus CHAND MUHAMMAD

Sindh Rented Premise Ordinance 1979 Sections 13 and 15 of the Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 115 of the Pakistan Constitution (1973), Article 185 (3), denial of the relationship between the landlord and the tenant parties was disputed because the applicant (the tenant) ) Respondent's son-in-law (respondent's house) Respondent filed a withdrawal case against the applicant for default and the applicant denied the landlord and tenant relationship and said that he was the person Who transferred the property in the name of the respondents and was allowed to occupy it. One and he spent a lot of money to build it The rent controller and the High Court found that there was a landlord and tenant relationship between the parties and the order to delete the applicant's (tenant) records. Unapproved Tenancy and Acceptance Defendants did not receive rent receipts from the applicant who claimed by the applicant that he spent through construction work through any voucher to support his property. Was not made, the defendant was recognized as the owner of the property and it was for the petitioner, who He said he had accepted for entry into the premises, they were being paid without proper documentation so that the parties were close to the nature of their occupation, it was incomprehensible. The absence of a tenancy agreement was due to the fact that the tenancy was formulated before the issuance of the Tenancy Ordinance, the 1979 case was a classic one. According to Article 115, Conan testimony, in 1984, a person, whom the tenant or another famous supreme court advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer