Find a Lawyer

SAID NADEEM ELECTRO LIMITED versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER, SALES TAX, PESHAWAR

Article 6 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973: The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 185 (3) of the duty to pay cell tax was rejected by the High Court on the basis of alternative treatment to no avail, but the claimants of legality. Claimed that all these views expressed on the merits of the trial were exempt from the sales tax payment of 14 sales and 17 black sizes of black and white televisions manufactured by their factory under the notification of 26 1988 1988; and sales. The demand for authorities to pay taxes was without legal authority. The High Court had rejected the applicant's constitutional request on the basis that there was an alternative suitable solution available to the applicant by referring to the Central Board of Revenue and furthermore that the dispute was in fact involved. Regarding merit, it has also been noted that the applicant's case was not covered under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution under the notification of the petition dated 26 26 1988, instead of customs, central excise and The pretrial appeal before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, where the applicant's appeal was dismissed due to non-availability of jurisdiction, the Supreme Court delayed the filing of leave for appeal and to consider this. Is granted whether the constitutional petition is not authorized without the applicant. An alternative to fatigue, the High Court should consider vi ews on the merits of the matter best law firm from Nilore lawyer