Find a Lawyer

LIAQAT ALI versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 540 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Appealing of a person as a court witness, after the alanka magistrate of the case is presented before the trial court The police superintendent ordered a re-investigation of the matter. The investigation was handed over to the deputy superintendent of police who was found innocent in the re-investigation, but could not present his report to the court because the challan had already been presented to the trial court after the prosecution's evidence came close. The defendant filed a petition before the trial court to summon the deputy superintendent of police as a court witness, which was rejected by the trial court, later, after approaching the defense evidence that the case was finalized. The accused again requests a deputy superintendent of police as a court witness Also has been removed. Despite the observation that the accused has the freedom to call the deputy superintendent of police offices as a defense witness, although the court had the authority under Section 4040, CRPC, to prosecute any person as a judicial witness. Call at any stage of the inquiry or trial, but the Deputy Superintendent of Police who found the accused innocent in the inquiry was one of the investigating officers and did not witness himself. There was no personal information in this case and the facts of this case, and the court was not satisfied that the deputy superintendent of police was necessary for the decision of the cast, even if the deputy superintendent had been referred by the trial court as a court witness. Called, in trial cases, accused top advocates from Lodhran lawyer