Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD LATIF versus S.H.O.


The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 and 16 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 380 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition were filed by the same parties without disclosing these facts through the High Court. The FIR was directed to strictly examine the dangerous situation of this nature after the earlier constitutional petition was dismissed for comment. An inquiry is underway in which both parties are required to present their evidence. Have not had enough opportunity to appear in the courtroom despite the notice in court and their conduct is not only professional Was neither admirable nor commendable, according to the Constitution, and was dismissed as unreasonable and material.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Satyana Bangla lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.