Find a Lawyer

EIDA versus ALLAH DAD

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) suit for declaration on the basis of possession of underground land Such cases were decided by the courts on the basis that the referee appointed by the consent of the petitioners The report was found to be a plaintiff. However, the High Court, therefore, dismissed the claim of the plaintiffs that the possession of the plaintiffs was not established on any part of the land, the report of the reference states that the plaintiffs' possession of any part of the land under consideration. Was not established, while the defendants were found in physical possession of a portion of the land, the High Court correctly found that the referee's report was misrepresented / misrepresented by the courts under question. He was not in possession of any part of the underground land. The owners did not have the qualification and, therefore, the High Court defendants rightfully dismissed, however, if they wish, the leave to appeal the case for possession of underground land was denied in the circumstances. divorce advocates from Kallur Kot lawyer