Find a Lawyer

ALLAH BUKHSH versus SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, RAWALPINDI DIVISION, RAWALPINDI

Articles 10 and 11 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), Article 185 (3) of the Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958 were initially allocated in favor of the respondents, thereafter the distribution of this section Was canceled after Adjusted for this was adjusted from the Compensation Book which was forged and presented to the respondent's professional with a notice to deposit certain amount which failed to comply with the demand notice. After the cancellation of the names of the applicants, the land in question was allotted to the respondent's respondent. The appeal against the cancellation of pending land was accepted and reinstated in his favor. The petitioner's attempt to salvage his allotment was unsuccessful to the High Court, the appeal for consideration was considered whether the services were served during the defendant's predecessor. His life was lived by his son, who was also the General Power of Attorney on behalf of his father and father, ntly by his brothers and sisters; even such documents were not attended by the settlement authority and the High Court. Yes. And does such a document show that the original Alotti (respondent's predecessor) served properly in his life and after his death on his son, who was the general counsel of his brothers and sisters? Give up immigration advocate from Hariwala lawyer