QUILES SAZ TOMAS versus STATE
Articles 42 and 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974, the dual appointment as an Income Tax Officer and Deputy Collector, the primary appointment of excise and taxation work was in dual capability, as an employee of the Income Tax Department. The fact of the Excise and Taxation Department is that at the relevant time when the Income Tax Officer did not affect the appointment of the Income Tax Officer as the Income Tax Officer did not affect the appointment of the Income Tax Officer, in particular. But when it was served the High Court's Income Tax Department benefits At the disposal of the independent Jammu and Kashmir Council as the employee of Noddings, the deputy collector, excise and taxation was not subordinate to the Income Tax at the time of the aforesaid survey, therefore, the task of surveying the income was given. Was not conducted, was held wrong, and was not sustainable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Theing Jattan More lawyer