Find a Lawyer

ABDUR REHMAN versus MEHRI

Under the validation of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 section 164 holding ordinance clause 166 (VI 1960), section 10 and 13 ratification of the Consolidation Scheme, the case is restricted to the Additional Commissioner (Stability) who appeals against the confirmation of village stability scheme. Filed twice, the Collector was remanded twice and the Collector on remand referred the matter to the Stability Officer for further report on the Consolidation Officer's report that the parties were not interested in pursuing the matter. And the case should be filed, the collector sent the case to the record room. And the applicant submitted the application to the Collector (stability) after about one year and 8 months for the restoration of the case (Association) and the Additional Commissioner (Stability) simultaneously rejected the request, causing time. The matter was banned without hearing by the parties as nothing was on record. To show that the parties, and especially Petty, who were pursuing the case, were presented with a notice for submission, the authorities below failed to restrict their request for a restoration of the matter. Was, of course, because the supply of goods was not properly dealt with and, secondly, the order of supply of goods was passed in absentia; the question of limitations was, in the circumstances, unnecessary because these matters. I was not limited to any question where, in the absence of the order, the order was contrary to the interests of the parties and without their knowledge The order was placed by the review authority. best law firms from Sanghar lawyer