Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KABIR versus STATE

Section 302/34 Apriet Iwate, the ocular account presented by the evidence that was the witness of other incidents, was confirmed by two other witnesses, both eye witnesses successfully examined the cross, presented by the doctor, Who presented the body to a post-mortem doctor. The doctor said the injuries on the body of the victim caused the death as usual. Medical evidence has proven the prosecution of the murderer's suspect, who declared the victim suspected, made illegal contact with his niece, had suffered a setback. On seeing the deceased, accidentally, on the way, it was naturally alleged that his rifle was fired on both bodies to avenge the family honor, and witnesses died. Eyewitnesses / suspects have confirmed the cause and the recovery of the rifle. There was no such cohesion against the other two accused, it was a direct motive and the weapons recovered from them did not prove that they were linked to the commission of the crime, the benefit of the doubt to the two accused. Should have been for the safe management of the administration of justice, therefore, both the defendants were acquitted in these circumstances, the defense version the accused taken by the offender was neither possible nor the statement of the defense defense witness who the accused Taken and was closely related to the defendant's prescription, was evidenced by medical evidence and the Chemical Examiner The prosecution's report proved beyond a doubt that the suspect had committed double murder. And this fact will not be denied ask a advocate free from Dadakhel lawyer