Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD EJAZ versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 182, 324, 506, 148 and 149 Police Rules, 1934, 8 24 7 Completion of the case The complainant / defendant who filed a case against the complainant / respondent under Sections 324, 506, 148 and 149 Action against Ali. Four witnesses were presented before the Investigation Officer who supported the complaining parties' case before D-section P and the complainant stated very clearly that the parties were closely related, the elders of the family had disputed the issue and Was promoted and that the complainant / respondent did not want to pursue the matter. Again, despite the statement of the accused / appellant, D-section P has observed in the diary of the case that according to his investigation against the accused / appellant, the case was false and D-section P directed Section H. To cancel the case against the accused / appellant and take action against the complainant / defendant under Section 182, PPC. Section HA prepared D's cancellation report in light of the complaint and prepared Klandra against the complaints NT / Respondent's case was registered under the complainant against the accused / appellant while Section HA Had canceled the D-section P directive without the order of any competent court, as required by law, in the absence of a competent court order, the accused could not be prosecuted. In the absence of any such order or cancellation of any such order under section 182, the PPC shall retain the custody of Klandra against the complainant and the case under section 182, PPC. Hold on to the run top civil advocates from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer