Find a Lawyer

LIAQUAT ALI versus THE STATE

Section 302/324/148/149 The definition of testimony that was confessed, was fully established The case against the accused was not a substitute as was alleged by them as such a plea was not made by the accused. Did not take up the matter during the investigation, nor was it based on the formal draft of the FIR on ocular evidence during the trial, which was relied upon by the trial court's complainant and other prosecution witnesses. He was injured during the incident, his presence could not be ruled out. No witnesses have been killed by the police for prosecution. I was The matter, first of all, was not because the incident took place in a palace or in a street, but because it happened on Paka Road. Second, in the case of long-standing enmity between influential people in the area, ordinary people have always refused to become witnesses and expressed resentment. The assailants / defendants were correctly identified by witnesses whose statements were correctly relied upon by the trial court. It is expected that in view of the truly sensational nature, the real culprits will be allowed to falsely accuse the accused on account of past enmity. The Ocular Account was a positive force in favor of prosecution, not only was the recovery of the offensive weapon used in the case proved by the prosecution, but the positive report from the technical service has increased its importance. Associated with the incident, and thus, the modern trial medical evidence corroborated the ocular evidence, the prosecutor established his case against the accused, he was sentenced in appropriate circumstances and sentenced. top advocate from Sahiwal lawyer