MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus THE STATE
Criminal Code (CRPC) Property Against Section 497 Crimes (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 21 bail accused were named in the FIR and the prosecution's witnesses identified the prosecution's witnesses against them. Price could only be reviewed at this trial and it was premature to say that the provisions of section 21 of the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodood) Ordinance 1979 did not apply at a stage under which Similar criminal cases should be framed against the accused. The 26-year-old talked about the wrong history, which can be properly analyzed in a trial after recording evidence relating to the fate of those cases, and their impact in the current case was questionable. That came under the ban. Section 497 (1), CR PC Bail, denied the accused the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Wana lawyer
