MUHAMMAD CHIRAGH versus RUSTAM ALI
Constitution Pakistan 1973 Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Appeal against the prosecution had failed to satisfactorily explain the abnormal delay in reporting the incident to the police, and such delay was decided. Was. The investigating officer suspected the prosecution's case. Eyewitnesses admitted that their statements, to the extent of one of the accused's involvement, were false and, as such, in the absence of any other verifiable situation regarding the other accomplices, they could not do so at cross-examination. To safely rely on the baseless and unfounded proposals given to the complainant, there may hardly be money to be involved in the crime or the involvement of the accused involved in the crime because of the defendant's superiority through the High Court. An appeal was dismissed pursuant to any legal error submitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Bat Khela lawyer