Appeal against successfully suppressing the facts stated in the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/148/149 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 could not possibly have been the basis for dismissing the prosecution case which the High Court relied on. There was an error in doing Medical record evidence was supported by the record-based ocular testicles; the dagger's recovery could not simply be ruled out because an eyewitness was one of the certified witnesses recorded by the trial court for the accused's conviction and Nor was it discussed by the High Court. When the suit against the accused was reasonably disputed, the judgment was acquitted by the High Court and the accused were sentenced under section 2302 / ? 148 / ? 149, although the parties. And there was a long-standing enmity of the PPC between private revenge. Was not considered as a mitigation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
