Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL versus THE STATE

Based on an inquiry into the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 155 (2) and 561A Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3, 4, 16 and 22 unidentified offenses, it was demanded that the CIA Department, The police had no authority to file or investigate the case, when Article 16, the Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order 1979, and the registration and raiding by I / CIA at that time were subject to the FIR. Did not know the crime. The defendant's house violated the provisions of the Police Party Article 22, Prohibited (Enforced Hadith) Order, 1979. 1979 The detainees were terminated with the observation that it was mentioned in the FIR that senior officers were being transferred to seek interrogation. The accused's case and investigation were allowed on the same day that the accused was booked and the crime was an identifiable offense under Article 3, Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order, 1979, irrespective of the question. Whether or not it was done in a public place, where a case was filed against the facts to strengthen the commission of both unrecognizable and unreasonable crimes, Section 155 (2), CR PC was not drawn And the police can investigate all these cases. Cases without the permission of a magistrate case against the accused in which information was reported by an informant or the police raided, but during interrogation when the co-accused, who revealed himself to be the partner or partner of the accused Was, for storing illegal liquor, and all things were found on the identification of such partner, Article 22, Prohibition (Enforcement) Order, 1979, therefore, strictly on the facts of the case against the accused. how to become a advocate from Sakardu lawyer