Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AMJAD versus STATE


He was, no doubt, nominated in the FIR, accused of reviewing the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 evidence, but the prosecution's witnesses clearly stated that he carried a butcher's knife in his hand. He was seen running away from the yard of the house and he did not have one. The statements made by the police under Section 161, CCPC, can be dealt with, it cannot be said that their previous statements have improved. The eyewitnesses were natural witnesses as they were prisoners of the house against whom there was no enmity or ill will. The accused alleged that a knife recovery was established on the offer of the accused. The confessional statement of the accused was properly and voluntarily reviewed by the evidence of the courts and no interference in the resulting conclusions was guaranteed, according to which the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Mirpur Khas lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.