Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

COMMONWEALTH TRUST LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX


Capital gains Capital Gains Count Capital Pricing Asset in respect of which section 50 (1) has been acquired is not available to such person at this date, the replacement of the fair market value value on which the Indian Income Tax Act 1961, section 32 Disallow, and, 45, 49, Disallow and Business 55 Expenses not allowed for business expenses which result in the benefit, convenience or allowance of employees to pay in cash Section 40 (a) (v) Indian Income Tax Not under section 40 (a) (v) of the Act, 1961. [Gokulas Das & Co vs. JP Shah (1995) 211 ITR 706 (Boom) rejected and CIT v. Commonwealth Trust Limited (1982) 135 ITR 19 reversed]

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Dargai lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.