PIYARO versus STATE
Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 was filed without any delay in the filing of evidence, which excluded the possibility of deliberations, consultations or attempts to involve them. Along with this, the ocular version was supported by the medical evidence and statement of the deceased present in the FIR, which was truly presented as the deceased declaration, the eyewitness testimony was unambiguously stated. The culprit was attributed to which he played an important role in the death of those who wore firearms. His case is related to the case of the acquittal partner, against whom an overt act was ruled not to be a material defect or a legal impairment, the appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Tando Jam lawyer
