NASRULLAH versus JAFFAR ULLAH
R57A Balochistan Government Servants (Conduct) Rules, 1979, R16 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Effect of Issuing a Root Permit for a Government Employer On the basis that the petitioner has objected to the route permit in favor of the defendant. That he is a civil servant. And since such a route permit could not be issued, it was important that he kept the credible material on record whether the respondent was a Rajput or a non-government employee and had assets in which he had The Transport Provincial Transport Authority had started the business, in an unrestricted order already showing that as far as the rules of the West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Ordinance, 1965 or under are concerned, the route permit has no objection. There was no such prohibition claimed by the applicant, however, in its favor, it was issued. A. Respondents by the Department, which means compliance with R 16, Balochistan Government Servants (Conduit) Rules, 1979, was not prepared by the applicant to interfere with any matter at the discretion used by the transport authority.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer