Find a Lawyer

DISTRICT COUNCIL, ABBOTTABAD versus AKBAR

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Predatory Act 1993 Section 21 Impact of non-compliance with the order to collect one-fifth of the potential value of suit land for suit pre-parishment The plaintiff has accumulated one-fifth of the probable value of suit land even till the extended date. Failed to do ()) In the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Prevention Act, 1993, the fifth deposit was compulsory in nature and the court had to pass an order according to the dismissal of the plaintiff in the absence of good cause, if the deposit Order has been canceled. The preconceived right of right was of a factual nature, the courts had always leaned against it and, insisting on such a right, insisted on strictly adhering to the pre-emptive law. And that was because there were provisions in pre-Hurriyat law. It is important to be conservative and harsh. The courts were not required to act mechanically and did not have to take the situation lightly, so that in this case the fifth deposit by the plaintiff could not be credited in any case. The plaintiff / pre-emptor's plaintiff was rightly rejected in order to comply with the court order in the matter of deposit. A fifth sum inheritance advocates near Mian Chunnu lawyer