Find a Lawyer

ABDUL KHALIL versus MANZOOR AHMAD

Section 44 (2) Constitution of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Office of Ombudsman Act, section 9 (2) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974, as a junior guard as a constitutional application restoration appointment, the applicant approves the department election committee and Under the appointment, the Forest Guard was appointed. This was then confirmed by the department selection committee. Respondents filed a petition before challenging the applicant's appointment, saying that they had passed the interview and test and were performing duties as Forest Guard without any compensation, but instead of their appointment to the position. Which is empty, the applicant was filled in by the respondent. The respondent claimed that he has the preferential right to be posted as Forest Guard in the Ombudsman Department, accepting the request of the respondent, applying to the relevant authority. The relevant authority has been directed to appoint the respondent in place of the petition against the order of the Ombudsman. Delegation of representation filed by Dugan The President, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, petitioner challenged the Ombudsman's order as the President of Azad Jammu and Kashmir affirmed in his constitutional petition without giving the applicant an opportunity to be heard. It has been approved by the Ombudsman, the High Court withdrew the respondent's order that the appointment of a petitioner, as the matter was not publicized under the relevant rules, had been made before the appointment of the applicant. The document was ongoing, not durable because there was a wide gap between an order that was invalid and something else. Violating the rules is not true. Suffice it to say top civil advocates from Baroute lawyer