Find a Lawyer

STATE versus SAID QAMASH

Under Section 156 (1) (8) (89) / 2 (S) FIR, the appeal against the anti-smuggling antique was being sold for the purpose of sale, but there is no explanation or evidence that this sale. How was done Outside the country, the aforementioned goods were not appreciated for smuggling, the accused was arrested at a location 65 km from the Afghan border (NWFP) and was not hidden inside Peshawar International. Antique seizures of the airport did not show the origin of the country, but the Gandhara civilization, which was acknowledged in the border of the province itself, was not sufficient to raise the suspicion that smuggled goods were smuggled. The goods were / the search suspect was not processed in accordance with the law, so any case against the accused was read with section 2 (s) of the Customs Act, 1969 under section 156 (1) (8) (89), The appeal against the accused's fate was accordingly dismissed Pakistan, top advocate family court from Poonch lawyer