MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus STATE
West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), S 103 The recovery of illicit arms attributed to the accused was not implicated in any imprisonment or after the intelligence was shocked, but who was the accused in another case. I was arrested and was in police custody. During the investigation it was stated that he could lead to the recovery of the illegal arm / Kalashnikov, such recovery should be done in accordance with the provisions of section 103, CRPC. Should. Or, the most respected residents of the area should attend and conduct a search operation in which a person from a neighborhood whose home allegedly possessed an illegal arm was not involved in the recovery and for such misleading No plausible explanation was given as to where the allegedly illegitimate arm was taken. The suspect did not have or had the recovery, but he owned and the other person had no proof of the record It was also learned that the allegedly recovered Kalashnikov was found in the room of another person. The hidden iron box was kept inside the suspect's special knowledge, the special possession of Kalashnikov by the suspect was not established, so he was accused of the illegal arms retrieval, which has no legal power. The accused was acquitted so that he could be held criminally responsible for the accusations leveled against him.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Kot Addu lawyer