MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 247 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), absence of Section 381 Complainant recommended the cancellation of the Case Investigation Officer, suggesting that the case against the accused was false and should be terminated, Upon such recommendation of the Investigating Officer, the notice was issued to the Magistrate to be presented to the complainant, but he was absent, on the date the Magistrate appointed a short and speaking injunction against the accused, such as the Investigation. The officer magistrate did not use his discretion when dealing with the matter briefly. The order of cancellation did not go deep into the matter and did not satisfy itself before agreeing to the order of the Investigating Officer approved by the magistrate, as it was not enforceable in this case because it had, in the opinion of the Investigating Officer, There was no legal or judicial reason for agreeing.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Tando Adam lawyer
